Abstract

Abstract
Face recognition applications have grown in parallel with the size of datasets, complexity of deep learning models and computational power. However, while deep learning models evolve to become more capable and computational power keeps increasing, the datasets available are being retracted and removed from public access. Privacy and ethical concerns are relevant topics within these domains. Through generative artificial intelligence, researchers have put efforts into the development of completely synthetic datasets that can be used to train face recognition systems. Nonetheless, the recent advances have not been sufficient to achieve performance comparable to the state-of-the-art models trained on real data. To study the drift between the performance of models trained on real and synthetic datasets, we leverage a massive attribute classifier (MAC) to create annotations for four datasets: two real and two synthetic. From these annotations, we conduct studies on the distribution of each attribute within all four datasets. Additionally, we further inspect the differences between real and synthetic datasets on the attribute set. When comparing through the Kullback-Leibler divergence we have found differences between real and synthetic samples. Interestingly enough, we have verified that while real samples suffice to explain the synthetic distribution, the opposite could not be further from being true.

Abstract
In fields that rely on high-stakes decisions, such as medicine, interpretability plays a key role in promoting trust and facilitating the adoption of deep learning models by the clinical communities. In the medical image analysis domain, gradient-based class activation maps are the most widely used explanation methods and the field lacks a more in depth investigation into inherently interpretable models that focus on integrating knowledge that ensures the model is learning the correct rules. A new approach, B-cos networks, for increasing the interpretability of deep neural networks by inducing weight-input alignment during training showed promising results on natural image classification. In this work, we study the suitability of these B-cos networks to the medical domain by testing them on different use cases (skin lesions, diabetic retinopathy, cervical cytology, and chest X-rays) and conducting a thorough evaluation of several explanation quality assessment metrics. We find that, just like in natural image classification, B-cos explanations yield more localised maps, but it is not clear that they are better than other methods' explanations when considering more explanation properties.

Abstract

Abstract