Abstract

Abstract

Abstract
Medical imaging is a rich source of invaluable information necessary for clinical judgements. However, the analysis of those exams is not a trivial assignment. In recent times, the use of deep learning (DL) techniques, supervised or unsupervised, has been empowered and it is one of the current research key areas in medical image analysis. This paper presents a survey of the use of DL architectures in computer-assisted imaging contexts, attending two different image modalities: the actively studied computed tomography and the under-studied positron emission tomography, as well as the combination of both modalities, which has been an important landmark in several decisions related to numerous diseases. In the making of this review, we analysed over 180 relevant studies, published between 2014 and 2019, that are sectioned by the purpose of the research and the imaging modality type. We conclude by addressing research issues and suggesting future directions for further improvement. To our best knowledge, there is no previous work making a review of this issue.

Abstract
In missing data contexts, k-nearest neighbours imputation has proven beneficial since it takes advantage of the similarity between patterns to replace missing values. When dealing with heterogeneous data, researchers traditionally apply the HEOM distance, that handles continuous, nominal and missing data. Although other heterogeneous distances have been proposed, they have not yet been investigated and compared for k-nearest neighbours imputation. In this work, we study the effect of several heterogeneous distances on k-nearest neighbours imputation on a large benchmark of publicly-available datasets.

Abstract
In healthcare domains, dealing with missing data is crucial since absent observations compromise the reliability of decision support models. K-nearest neighbours imputation has proven beneficial since it takes advantage of the similarity between patients to replace missing values. Nevertheless, its performance largely depends on the distance function used to evaluate such similarity. In the literature, k-nearest neighbours imputation frequently neglects the nature of data or performs feature transformation, whereas in this work, we study the impact of different heterogeneous distance functions on k-nearest neighbour imputation for biomedical datasets. Our results show that distance functions considerably impact the performance of classifiers learned from the imputed data, especially when data is complex. © 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Abstract
Saliency maps have been used as one possibility to interpret deep neural networks. This method estimates the relevance of each pixel in the image classification, with higher values representing pixels which contribute positively to classification. The goal of this study is to understand how the complexity of the network affects the interpretabilty of the saliency maps in classification tasks. To achieve that, we investigate how changes in the regularization affects the saliency maps produced, and their fidelity to the overall classification process of the network. The experimental setup consists in the calculation of the fidelity of five saliency map methods that were compare, applying them to models trained on the CIFAR-10 dataset, using different levels of weight decay on some or all the layers. Achieved results show that models with lower regularization are statistically (significance of 5%) more interpretable than the other models. Also, regularization applied only to the higher convolutional layers or fully-connected layers produce saliency maps with more fidelity.