Abstract

Abstract
Over the past fewdecades, the amount of information generated turned the Web into the largest knowledge infrastructure existing to date. Web archives have been at the forefront of data preservation, preventing the losses of significant data to humankind. Different snapshots of the web are saved everyday enabling users to surf the past web and to travel through this overtime. Despite these efforts, many people are not aware that the web is being preserved, often finding these infrastructures to be unattractive or difficult to use, when compared to common search engines. In this paper, we give a step towards making use of this preserved information to develop Public Archive an intuitive interface that enables end-users to search and analyze a large-scale of 67,242 past preserved news articles belonging to a Portuguese reference newspaper (Jornal Publico). The referred collection was obtained by scraping 10,976 versions of the homepage of the Jornal Publico preserved by the Portuguese web archive infrastructure (Arquivo.pt) during the time-period of 2010 to 2021. By doing this, we aim, not only to mark a stand in what respects to make use of this preserved information, but also to come up with an easy-to-follow solution, the Public Archive python package, which creates the roots to be used (with minor adaptations) by other news source providers interested in offering their readers access to past news articles.

Abstract
In our data-flooded age, an enormous amount of redundant, but also disparate textual data is collected on a daily basis on a wide variety of topics. Much of this information refers to documents related to the same theme, that is, different versions of the same document, or different documents discussing the same topic. Being aware of such differences turns out to be an important aspect for those who want to perform a comparative task. However, as documents increase in size and volume, keeping up-to-date, detecting, and summarizing relevant changes between different documents or versions of it becomes unfeasible. This motivates the rise of the contrastive or comparative summarization task, which attempts to summarize the text of different documents related to the same topic in a way that highlights the relevant differences between them. Our research aims to provide a systematic literature review on contrastive or comparative summarization, highlighting the different methods, data sets, metrics, and applications. Overall, we found that contrastive summarization is most commonly used in controversial news articles, controversial opinions or sentiments on a topic, and reviews of a product. Despite the great interest in the topic, we note that standard data sets, as well as a competitive task dedicated to this topic, are yet to come to be proposed, eventually impeding the emergence of new methods. Moreover, the great breakthrough of using deep learning-based language models for abstract summaries in contrastive summarization is still missing.

Abstract
Versioned documents are common in many situations and play a vital part in numerous applications enabling an overview of the revisions made to a document or document collection. However, as documents increase in size, it gets difficult to summarize and comprehend all the changes made to versioned documents. In this paper, we propose a novel research problem of contrastive keyword extraction from versioned documents, and introduce an unsupervised approach that extracts keywords to reflect the key changes made to an earlier document version. In order to provide an easy-to-use comparison and summarization tool, an open-source demonstration is made available which can be found at https://contrastive-keyword-extraction.streamlit.app/.

Abstract
[No abstract available]

Abstract