Abstract
Cybersickness refers to the negative symptoms caused by exposure to a Virtual Reality (VR) experience. The literature is consensual that cybersickness is a key factor in an experience, as the non-existence of cybersickness provides an optimal virtual experience. Thus, it is of utmost importance to evaluate cybersickness when assessing VR applications to understand the impact of this factor on the user experience and, ultimately, on the VR application viability. However, there is a lack of Portuguese instruments to evaluate this variable. To tackle this, this aimed to translate and validate the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) to Portuguese so it can be used with the Portuguese population and maintain its psychometric properties. The new instrument was validated using a sample of 603 Portuguese subjects aged between 16 and 79. Based on the observed results, the obtained theoretical model shows that the Portuguese version of the SSQ is valid for properly evaluating cybersickness in VR experiences with Portuguese samples.

Abstract
Over the years, various immersive virtual training environments (iVTEs) have been developed, allowing companies to start transitioning to Virtual Reality (VR) technologies to train their personnel. This transition forces companies to start using game engines as a foundation to develop such iVTEs, which also requires a multidisciplinary team. When developing such training environments, challenges on how to present tasks to users arise. The way these tasks are presented can dictate the efficacy of the VR training application. This paper presents three different task presentation methodologies (avatar animation, videos, and instruction manual) and assesses them using 36 participants, divided into those three groups. Usability, sense of presence, satisfaction, cybersickness, and technology acceptance variables were studied and results indicated that only the total number of actions performed had differences between groups where the instruction manual reported the higher number of actions (usability) when compared to the other conditions. Therefore it was concluded that the instruction manual proved to be where users kept losing focus and making more actions. It was also concluded that all conditions had a similar sense of presence, satisfaction, cybersickness, and acceptance scores.