2024
Authors
Silva, A; Restivo, A; Santos, M; Soares, C;
Publication
CoRR
Abstract
2024
Authors
Silva, IOe; Soares, C; Cerqueira, V; Rodrigues, A; Bastardo, P;
Publication
Progress in Artificial Intelligence - 23rd EPIA Conference on Artificial Intelligence, EPIA 2024, Viana do Castelo, Portugal, September 3-6, 2024, Proceedings, Part III
Abstract
TadGAN is a recent algorithm with competitive performance on time series anomaly detection. The detection process of TadGAN works by comparing observed data with generated data. A challenge in anomaly detection is that there are anomalies which are not easy to detect by analyzing the original time series but have a clear effect on its higher-order characteristics. We propose Meta-TadGAN, an adaptation of TadGAN that analyzes meta-level representations of time series. That is, it analyzes a time series that represents the characteristics of the time series, rather than the original time series itself. Results on benchmark datasets as well as real-world data from fire detectors shows that the new method is competitive with TadGAN. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
2024
Authors
Strecht, P; Moreira, JM; Soares, C;
Publication
Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science - 10th International Conference, LOD 2024, Castiglione della Pescaia, Italy, September 22-25, 2024, Revised Selected Papers, Part I
Abstract
In many organizations with a distributed operation, not only is data collection distributed, but models are also developed and deployed separately. Understanding the combined knowledge of all the local models may be important and challenging, especially in the case of a large number of models. The automated development of consensus models, which aggregate multiple models into a single one, involves several challenges, including fidelity (ensuring that aggregation does not penalize the predictive performance severely) and completeness (ensuring that the consensus model covers the same space as the local models). In this paper, we address the latter, proposing two measures for geometrical and distributional completeness. The first quantifies the proportion of the decision space that is covered by a model, while the second takes into account the concentration of the data that is covered by the model. The use of these measures is illustrated in a real-world example of academic management, as well as four publicly available datasets. The results indicate that distributional completeness in the deployed models is consistently higher than geometrical completeness. Although consensus models tend to be geometrically incomplete, distributional completeness reveals that they cover the regions of the decision space with a higher concentration of data. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
The access to the final selection minute is only available to applicants.
Please check the confirmation e-mail of your application to obtain the access code.