Abstract
In this paper, we investigate two variants of association rules for preference data, Label Ranking Association Rules and Pairwise Association Rules. Label Ranking Association Rules (LRAR) are the equivalent of Class Association Rules (CAR) for the Label Ranking task. In CAR, the consequent is a single class, to which the example is expected to belong to. In LRAR, the consequent is a ranking of the labels. The generation of LRAR requires special support and confidence measures to assess the similarity of rankings. In this work, we carry out a sensitivity analysis of these similarity-based measures. We want to understand which datasets benefit more from such measures and which parameters have more influence in the accuracy of the model. Furthermore, we propose an alternative type of rules, the Pairwise Association Rules (PAR), which are defined as association rules with a set of pairwise preferences in the consequent. While PAR can be used both as descriptive and predictive models, they are essentially descriptive models. Experimental results show the potential of both approaches.

Abstract
Recently, a number of learning algorithms have been adapted for label ranking, including instance-based and tree-based methods. In this paper, we propose an adaptation of association rules for label ranking. The adaptation, which is illustrated in this work with APRIORI Algorithm, essentially consists of using variations of the support and confidence measures based on ranking similarity functions that are suitable for label ranking. We also adapt the method to make a prediction from the possibly conflicting consequents of the rules that apply to an example. Despite having made our adaptation from a very simple variant of association rules for classification, the results clearly show that the method is making valid predictions. Additionally, they show that it competes well with state-of-the-art label ranking algorithms.