Abstract
Machine Learning systems are generally thought of as fully automatic. However, in recent years, interactive systems in which Human experts actively contribute towards the learning process have shown improved performance when compared to fully automated ones. This may be so in scenarios of Big Data, scenarios in which the input is a data stream, or when there is concept drift. In this paper we present a system for supporting auditors in the task of financial fraud detection. The system is interactive in the sense that the auditors can provide feedback regarding the instances of the data they use, or even suggest new variables. This feedback is incorporated into newly trained Machine Learning models which improve over time. In this paper we show that the order by which instances are evaluated by the auditors, and their feedback incorporated, influences the evolution of the performance of the system over time. The goal of this paper is to study of different instance selection strategies for Human evaluation and feedback can improve the learning speed. This information can then be used by the system to determine, at each moment, which instances would improve the system the most, so that these can be suggested to the users for validation. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Abstract
Machine Learning has been evolving rapidly over the past years, with new algorithms and approaches being devised to solve the challenges that the new properties of data pose. Specifically, algorithms must now learn continuously and in real time, from very large and possibly distributed sets of data. In this paper we describe a learning system that tackles some of these novel challenges. It learns and adapts in realtime by continuously incorporating user feedback, in a fully autonomous way. Moreover, it allows for users to manage features (e.g. add, edit, remove), reflecting these changes on-the-fly in the Machine Learning pipeline. The paper describes some of the main functionalities of the system, which despite being of general-purpose, is being developed in the context of a project in the domain of financial fraud detection.

Abstract
Artificial Intelligence is a hot topic and Machine Learning is one of the most fluent approaches and practices. The problem with many AI models is that they can be useful for predicting but they are bad at explaining why they behave a certain way. In some contexts, the explanation may even be more important than the prediction itself, mainly in systems in which decisions are made based on their predictions. Therefore, it is increasingly necessary to provide a forecast accompanied by an explanation, when decisions are made automatically. This paper aims to contribute to the solution of problem based on human mobility research, or at least, to be a starting point for its solution.

Abstract
The main focus of an Intelligent environment, as with other applications of Artificial Intelligence, is generally on the provision of good decisions towards the management of the environment or the support of human decision-making processes. The quality of the system is often measured in terms of accuracy or other performance metrics, calculated on labeled data. Other equally important aspects are usually disregarded, such as the ability to produce an intelligible explanation for the user of the environment. That is, asides from proposing an action, prediction, or decision, the system should also propose an explanation that would allow the user to understand the rationale behind the output. This is becoming increasingly important in a time in which algorithms gain increasing importance in our lives and start to take decisions that significantly impact them. So much so that the EU recently regulated on the issue of a “right to explanation”. In this paper we propose a Human-centric intelligent environment that takes into consideration the domain of the problem and the mental model of the Human expert, to provide intelligible explanations that can improve the efficiency and quality of the decision-making processes. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.

Abstract
As the field of Machine Learning evolves, the number of available learning algorithms and their parameters continues to grow. On the one hand, this is positive as it allows for the finding of potentially more accurate models. On the other hand, however, it also makes the process of finding the right model more complex, given the number of possible configurations. Traditionally, data scientists rely on trial-and-error or brute force procedures, which are costly, or on their own intuition or expertise, which is hard to acquire. In this paper we propose an approach for algorithm recommendation based on meta-learning. The approach can be used in real-time to predict the best n algorithms (based on a selected performance metric) and their configuration, for a given ML problem. We evaluate it through cross-validation, and by comparing it against an Auto ML approach, in terms of accuracy and time. Results show that the proposed approach recommends algorithms that are similar to those of traditional approaches, in terms of performance, in just a fraction of the time.

Abstract
In the last years, the number of machine learning algorithms and their parameters has increased significantly. On the one hand, this increases the chances of finding better models. On the other hand, it increases the complexity of the task of training a model, as the search space expands significantly. As the size of datasets also grows, traditional approaches based on extensive search start to become prohibitively expensive in terms of computational resources and time, especially in data streaming scenarios. This paper describes an approach based on meta-learning that tackles two main challenges. The first is to predict key performance indicators of machine learning models. The second is to recommend the best algorithm/configuration for training a model for a given machine learning problem. When compared to a state-of-the-art method (AutoML), the proposed approach is up to 130x faster and only 4% worse in terms of average model quality. Hence, it is especially suited for scenarios in which models need to be updated regularly, such as in streaming scenarios with big data, in which some accuracy can be traded for a much shorter model training time.