Abstract
The integration of wind power in electricity generation brings new challenges to the unit commitment problem, as a result of the random nature of the wind speed. The scheduling of thermal generation units at the day-ahead stage is usually based on wind power forecasts. Due to technical limitations of thermal units, deviations from those forecasts during intra-day operations may lead to unwanted consequences, such as load shedding and increased operating costs. Wind power forecasting uncertainty has been handled in practice by means of conservative stochastic scenario-based optimization models, or through additional operating reserve settings. However, generation companies may have different attitudes towards the risks associated to wind power variability. In this paper, operating costs and load shedding are modeled by non-linear utility functions aggregated into a single additive utility function of a multi-objective model. Computational experiments have been done to validate the approach: firstly we test our model for the wind-thermal unit commitment problem and, in a second stage, pumped storage hydro units are added, leading to a model with wind-hydro-thermal coordination. Results have shown that the proposed methodology is able to correctly reflect different risk profiles of decision makers for both models.

Abstract
This paper evaluates the flexibility provided by distributed energy resources (DER) in a real electricity distribution network in Germany. Using the Interval Constrained Power Flow (ICPF) tool, the maximum range of flexibility available at the primary substation was obtained for different operation scenarios. Three test cases were simulated, differing mainly in the considered level of renewable energy sources (RES) production. For each test case, the obtained results enabled the construction of flexibility areas that define, for a given operating point, the limits of feasible values for the active and reactive power that can be exchanged between the TSO and the DSO. Furthermore, the tool can also be used to evaluate the contribution from each type of DER to the overall distribution network flexibility.

Abstract

Abstract
This paper presents two contributions developed in the framework of evolvDSO Project to support TSO-DSO cooperation. The Interval Constrained Interval Power Flow (ICPF) tool estimates the flexibility range at primary substations by aggregating the distribution network flexibility. The Sequential Optimal Power Flow (SOPF) tool defines a set of control actions that keep the active and reactive power flow within pre-agreed limits at primary substations level, by integrating different types of flexibility levers. Several study test cases were simulated using data of four real distribution networks from France and Portugal, with different demand/generation profiles and several degrees of flexibility.

Abstract
The growing integration of renewable energy in power systems demands for adequate planning of generation systems not only to meet long-term capacity requirements hut also to cope with sudden capacity shortages that can occur during system operation. As a matter of fact, system operators must schedule an adequate amount of operational reserve to avoid capacity deficits which can be caused by, for instance, overestimating the wind power that will be available. The framework proposed for the long-term assessment of operational reserve relies on the Nave forecasting method to produce wind power forecasts for the next hour. This forecasting model is simple and widely used to obtain short-term forecasts. However, it has been shown that regression models, such as the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model, can outperform the Naive model even for forecasting horizons of up to 1 hour. This paper investigates the differences in the risk indices obtained for the long-term operational reserve when using the Naive and the ARIMA forecasting models. The objective is to assess the impact of the forecasting error in the long-term operational reserve risk indices. Experiments using the Sequential Monte Carlo Simulation (SMCS) method were carried out on a modified version of the IEEE RTS 79 test system that includes wind and hydro power variability. A sensitivity analysis was also performed taking into account several wind power integration scenarios and two different merit orders for scheduling generating units.

Abstract
In this paper, a number of possibilities are presented and discussed for the ownership of distributed storage devices (DSD) in a Smart Grid environment. The cases in which the distribution system operator (DSO) has either full control (grid owned storage) or no control whatsoever over the operation of the DSD (independently owned storage) will be differentiated. For each ownership possibility, the technical and regulatory implications are discussed, with analysis and validation of the results being performed on real MV distribution networks, both rural and urban. In order to evaluate each ownership possibility, a number of multi-period optimization models are presented, corresponding to different assumptions in regards to the operation of the DSD. The resulting daily operation strategies are subsequently used as a basis for carrying out distribution reinforcement planning.